SOC and threat intel
Forty alerts.One of them matters.
The alert arrives with an address and nothing else, and the interesting one looks exactly like the other thirty nine.
Five tools, one address, no time.
The five things you need to know about that address live in five products that do not know about each other.
So the analyst does the join by hand. Then does it thirty nine more times. The interesting one looks like the boring ones until somebody happens to look closely.
Hunting has the same shape. Take down one phishing domain and nineteen more appear next week, registered together to be burned in sequence. Your blocklist sees them one at a time, as they burn.
What it costs a shift.
- Time
Tens of minutes for every indicator that deserves a real look.
- Inconsistency
Two analysts, two verdicts, and no audit trail for either.
- False positives
Nothing in the stack can clear a host. It can only fail to flag it.
- Missed pivots
Related infrastructure never gets looked at, because looking costs too much.
The context arrives with the alert.
One query does the join the analyst used to do by hand.
Enrichment in place
One search command in Splunk, or a connector in Sentinel or OpenCTI. No new tab for anyone to remember.
One pivot to the cluster
When it is real, one query returns the shared certificates, co-hosted domains, registrant and neighbours.
Clear it or escalate it
Known-good allowlists and ownership let you clear a host outright. That is where fewer false positives come from.
A verdict you can check.
Every verdict comes back with its sources, their weights and the sum. Two analysts reach the same answer, and either one can show why.
Every layer at once
Certificate, co-hosting, registrant, nameserver, prefix, network and TLS fingerprint, in one traversal.
Attribution past the CDN
Who really runs the host behind the proxy, and what their network usually hosts.
Export where it lives
STIX 2.1 and MISP out, so the finding lands in the platform you already run.
Measured
The workflows that do this job.
Each one starts from a single indicator and returns its evidence with it.
Enrich an indicator
Owner, hosting, mail and reputation for one address, on a single card.
Run a full investigation
Start from one indicator and work outward to everything connected to it.
Expand a domain into its estate
Find the real owner, then the rest of what they run.
Find lookalike domains
The registered lookalikes of your domain, in one scan.
Build a takedown package
The evidence a registrar or host asks for, gathered in one pass.
Catch a subdomain takeover
Subdomains still pointing at a service you have torn down.
Hunts a blocklist could not run.
Eight seconds against forty five minutes
Three addresses classified with a full evidence trail in eight seconds. The same three took forty five minutes by hand.
Clean on every feed
Three addresses scored zero on every feed. One network sat behind all three, and one of the addresses answered for tens of thousands of domains.
One domain becomes a campaign
A single phishing domain expanded to nineteen related domains. They went live four to five days later.
The pivot no feed had
One anonymising address led to a cluster of certificates reusing the same issuer and subject on unrelated hosts. None of it was in the commercial feeds already in place.